Research about California Schools
California Education Studies
Carroll, S., et al. (2004). California’s K-12 public schools:
How are they doing? Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2004/RAND_MG186.pdf
A new study says California schools, once considered the country's
best, now trail national averages in almost every indicator of school
quality. Researchers point to a 1978 cap on property tax increases as
the root of the state's educational problems, which include a ranking
of 48 out of 50 states on national tests and the second-highest student-teacher
ratio in the nation.
California’s hidden teacher spending gap. (2005). San
Francisco: Education Trust-West.
http://www.hiddengap.org/resources/Report_FINAL.pdf
California teachers who work in schools serving mostly low-income
and minority students are paid less than colleagues in more affluent and
predominantly white ones, even when the schools are in the same district.
The report says rigid union contracts and district budgeting formulas
exacerbate the pay disparity
Helfand, D. (2005, Feb. 9). More students show fluency in English. Los
Angeles Times.
According to California education officials, 47% of limited English students
tested fluent on the state's English Language Development Test last year,
which marks the third straight year of gains. State officials attributed
the improvement to better-trained teachers and the use of specialized
instructional materials, although they noted some of the increase may
have stemmed from schools' continuing to classify students as English
learners after they tested proficient.
Hayasaki, E. (2005, Feb. 6). Charter schools a beacon of hope. Los
Angeles Times.
Charter schools are extremely popular among minority families in California's
urban areas. While studies are mixed about whether students in charters
outperform peers in traditional public schools, many families like the
disciplined, private-school feel of the alternative schools.
Helfand, D. (2005, Feb. 7). Reading program didn’t boost skills.
Los Angeles Times.
Some Los Angeles Unified School District board members question why the
district should commit more money on the nearly $50 million Waterford
Early Reading program when internal reviews have found the program to
be ineffective and underused.

